Showing posts with label theological study. Show all posts
Showing posts with label theological study. Show all posts

Sunday, March 31, 2024

Asterisks and Obelisks on the Bullet Journal Method for Getting Things Done and Doing Deep Work

To use a bound notebook (like a composition book or a bullet journal) to implement David Allen’s Getting Things Done and Cal Newport’s Deep Work, certain modifications need to be applied to Ryder Carroll’s Bullet Journal Method. In ancient manuscripts, an asterisk (*) meant a recommended addition, and an obelisk (÷) meant a recommended deletion. The following are my asterisks and obelisks on the Bullet Journal Method, which support Getting Things Done and Deep Work. If you are familiar with at least two of these three books, this will all make sense. I hope it’s helpful!

Materials

I use a regular college-ruled composition book, black and blue pens, a pencil, correction tape, a ruler, sticky tabs, and sticky notes.

Procedures when using a BuJo or notebook

At the front, reserve 4–5 pages for an index. Each page is numbered (* right hand pages odd, left hand pages even). When you fill up a page, start another page of the same topic at the next blank page. Note the new page’s number in the index. Threading: in the upper inside corner, indicate whither the page’s topic continues and whence it resumes, using arrows and page numbers. In a composition book, the left margin can be used for dating entries.

Follow the BuJo Method’s advice for setting up the Index, Future Log, and Monthly Log. Start the Daily Log whenever you need it, but see below on Contextual Next Action Lists before you add to the Daily Log.

Getting Things Done

Inboxes. ÷ BuJo uses the Daily Log as an inbox. * Instead, use physical inboxes, e-mail inbox, and a piece of scratch paper in your pocket. Use the Daily Log for notes, thoughts, and a log of events.

Calendar. * For time-specific events, use a digital calendar or dedicated analog calendar. You could also set up 12 pages at the front of your notebook as a calendar, giving one line to each day and one page to each month.

Contextual Next Action Lists. ÷ BuJo puts all tasks in the Daily Log, Monthly Log, and Future Log, which are time-specific but not context-specific. * Instead, put lists of contextual Next Actions at the end of the notebook, working your way forward. This way, all the Next Action lists can be reviewed in one place.

Project Support Material. BuJo uses Collections (dedicated pages). * Make an index of projects in the Next Actions section (at the end of the notebook). For each project, specify where the project support material is found. It could be a page in the notebook, a computer folder, a physical folder, or the like.

Deferral System. BuJo uses the Month Log and Future Log. * Also use a tickler file system and/or a separate calendar dedicated to future NA’s.

Maybe Someday. ÷ BuJo puts “maybe someday” items in a Collection. * Instead, put them in a separate notebook and a digital to-do list (the latter only for online activities).

Storage/Filing. BuJo uses the Daily Log and Month Log. * The Daily Log is especially suitable for recording events, meeting summaries, and thoughts that are not immediately actionable. The Month Log is suitable for recording events with references to where more information is found. For material that is specific to a topic, use a filing system (analog and/or digital).

Weekly Review. ÷ BuJo does a review of the system in the Monthly Migration. * Instead, do a Weekly Review. It is useful to record the steps of your Weekly Review on a page of your notebook.

Deep Work

Time Blocking. ÷ BuJo does not do this. * Either use a separate calendar/planner (such as Cal Newport’s Time Block Planner) or make your own Week Plan on two or three pages. In my Week Plan, each page has four columns. Hours of the day run down the margin. Each line represents a half hour. One column is for the day’s block plan (in pencil: APPOINTMENTS IN CAPS and contingent events lowercased). The next column is used for the day’s Next Actions and Metrics. I record my time spent on various activities. I use underline to denote time spent on Deep Work. In this system, two days fit on one page. Weekend days get only one column each. On the weekend, I do not time block, but note the appointments at the top of the column and Next Actions at the bottom.

Multi-Horizon Planning (daily/weekly/quarterly). BuJo uses the Future Log and Monthly Log. * In addition, make a Year Overview, one week per year, which lists the long-term deep work projects you hope to work on during each week. The Month Log is used to list tasks and projects you hope to complete this month. The top margin of the Week Plan is a good place to list tasks and projects you hope to complete this week.

Other Options

You could try the Everbook system. I like how it is expandable, but I found it insufficient for my needs because one cannot assign page numbers, and therefore one cannot make an index, and therefore I lose stuff and have to spend a long time hunting for individual items. There's a reason the codex was invented at the beginning of the Christian era: it is convenient for finding information. That is the biggest benefit of using a bound book (a codex) for staying organized.

You could try any number of digital systems, but I find it much easier to flip open a book and go. There is too much distraction in your phone, so the less time you spend looking at it, the better. 

Example Pages

Week Plan

First, the week plan for the upcoming week. In the left column for each day is the schedule. At the bottom, tasks for at home. In the right column for each day is my personal timekeeping (for tracking projects and deep work), with work tasks at the bottom. Notice that Saturday and Sunday only need one column each, since I don't schedule my time so closely.


Next, the week plan after a completed week.


Page 133 is a "collection," a project page on which I track a quota: a way to prevent myself from getting too overloaded!

Index

Here I put a blue "R" in the margin for reference pages, and "NA" in the margin for "Next Action" pages (which are at the end of the notebook).

Month Log

The left page of the Month Log spread has the days of the month. Here I track events that I might need to reference later on. The right edge of the page is for activity tracking. I start and stop these from time to time. On the right page I list tasks I'm hoping to accomplish this month.

Future Log

This is my implementation of the Bullet Journal "future log." I use it for tasks and events that are coming up. Perhaps I underutilize it due to my use of the Month Log and the next feature: the Year Project Overview.


Year Project Overview

Here I plan out what projects I will work at from week to week. This allows me to estimate whether I will have enough time to do my projects.

Daily Log

The daily log is the heart of Carroll Ryder's Bullet Journal method, but it's not central for me. I use it as a place to record random notes and events if I don't have a better place for them. I do not put next actions here, and my "control center" is the Week Plan pages (above). 

Page 85 is an example of a "collection," a project page for a particular event.

Concluding Thoughts

What I love about this system is the codex format, in which every page is numbered and can be then referenced from any other page. If there's a need for more explanation of a task than can fit someplace, it's easy to cross-reference another page with more room for explanation. Arrows with page numbers at the top inside corner of pages give the threading throughout the volume. If I forget to index something, I'll find it eventually via the threading.

What I disliked about the BuJo method was the cumbersome process of transferring all of one's tasks from month to month. That's not realistic for me, so putting tasks and projects in their own contextual pages at the end of the journal makes the weekly review and monthly review processes much easier, since there's no need to recopy so many tasks (which often cannot be given up).

Finally, each BuJo implementation is very personal for the needs and aesthetic of the individual. I am totally uninterested in making my bullet notebook pretty. I use the minimum number of pen strokes to keep myself organized (for example, in the Week Plan pages). My implementation might look horribly messy to some people, but it gives me the information I need quickly and without distraction. Therefore I recommend it to all my readers.

Monday, November 27, 2023

Mayes Procedure for Sermon Writing

Folks have asked me for this, so here it is! I use this mainly to generate content (rhetorical inventio). For other procedures that I admire, see this and this.

Procedure for Sermon Writing

Find old sermons and notes in physical files and computer.

Make note sheet with the readings on them (or Notes document on computer).

Read the readings in NKJV or ESV.

Discuss the sermon text with others, especially laypeople, to see what questions they have of the text. Be sure to research and address these.

Review exegetical computer documents, filed by book of Bible.

[For saints’ days, consult both historical (e.g. Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche or Catholic Encyclopedia) and legendary sources (Jacobus de Voragine, Golden Legend).]

Compare main Bible versions: NKJV or ESV, KJV, Vulgate, Lutherbibel.

Read sermon text in original language. (Add to “Textual Notes”.)

Check Index Rerum for topics. (This is my personal master index of my past research. See this for one way to make an index for yourself. My Index Rerum is organized alphabetically by topic, however.)

Look up the passage in Book of Concord.

Read a commentary, or look up the passage in dogmatics, if necessary. If there is time, read one ancient commentary and one classic Lutheran commentary. 

Outline the sermon.

Find illustrations for each point.

Find practical uses (can use “Evangelischer Wegweiser” in Gerhard’s Schola Pietatis at the beginning, or Das Weimarische Bibelwerk). For more on practical uses, see this. The uses are:

  • Teaching
  • Admonishing
  • Warning
  • Consoling

Look for antithesis. (What would be the opposite of this teaching, consolation, command, example, virtue, or vice? How has this been misunderstood?)

Find the cross in this pericope, or bring it in from one of the other texts of the day. Don’t force it in, but if the cross of atonement isn’t there, remind the hearers who our God is, about His will to save mankind through the cross of Christ, and who they are.

Answer the question: “Why is this important for the hearers to hear?”

Write (but write the introduction last). 1400 words for a short Sunday sermon (2000 words max), 1000 words for a short chapel sermon (1400 words max).

Practice.

Categories of Illustration

Use illustrations from the common experience of your hearers. Keep illustrations short: no more than one sentence, and less than a sentence is best.

  • Combat
  • Lawsuit
  • Physician/medicine
  • Family/servitude
  • Government
  • Market/commerce
  • Nature/farming
  • Food and drink
  • Body
  • Building/architecture/construction
  • Crime/police
  • Love
  • Machinery/electricity/technology
  • School/education
  • Gifts

Monday, May 15, 2023

How to Organize Digital Commonplace Notes for Theology or Anything Else

This post is a companion post to the prior post on taking analog notes. In the first section I will cover the reasoning behind my system (which is more important than any specific implementation), and in the second section I will give a simple method for storing digital notes. If you only want the method, read the second section, but a method is far less important than understanding why you are doing what you are doing.

I. The Reason for the Method

Dr. Mayes and I fundamentally agree on our philosophy of taking notes (he as an academic, I as a parish pastor). Where we differ is only in method, which is not that important.

Storing notes is not about amassing quotes. It does little use to store a bunch of data that never gets used. Not only must the data be stored, but in such a way that it will present itself to us for thought when we need it. It is as if our notes become a lifelong conversation partner.

It’s not just saving quotes and passages, but why and what we were thinking in notating it. It’s not just that notes need to be linked, but write down why we are linking them.

Such notes guard our thinking against the feature positive effect (Ahrens-2017, 117). This is the natural tendency to give greater importance to information that readily comes to mind or to information that has been more recently acquired despite the fact that it might not be the most relevant information. This is a powerful argument against just preaching whatever comes to mind first in sermon preparation. Awareness of this defect in our thinking does make us less prone to engaging in it. But the classical process of inventio (discovering things to say) sought to combat this by asking questions to find the most relevant facts and argument. We force ourselves away from the feature positive effect and toward discovery by distinguishing Law and Gospel, the fivefold applications of Scripture, and by asking questions like: What is not meant? What is excluded? What is interesting? Relevant? Why? So what? Such inventio is also part of the note-making processes.

Simply put, writing is thinking. We often think we understand something we’ve read or heard but then struggle to express those ideas in writing or in clear, unbroken speech. If it can’t be written out, it doesn’t count. Here technology does us a disservice, and I will freely bow to the superiority of an all-analog system such as Dr. Mayes described. Although the digital revolution allows us to aggregate data like never before, we know less. Typing and digital recordings allow us to record things verbatim. Handwritten notes are slower, and therein lies their power. Handwritten notes force us to summarize and rephrase as we read or listen to a lecture. Current psychology suggests that taking handwritten notes for lectures and books is better than digital note taking because it forces summarizing and elaboration. The ability to review every word is not the same as learning. But if I put the idea into my own words I thus prove that I understand it, whereas digital notes can be stored verbatim without understanding and therefore with less ability to recall (Ahrens-2017, 78).

The philosopher John Searle explains it with concision, “If you can’t say it clearly, you don’t understand it yourself.” Bad preaching and bad catechesis is unclear. With good reason did our orthodox fathers urge us to read our Bibles with pens in hand, creating our own outlines, connections, paraphrases, and summaries for each chapter of the Bible. In prescribing just such a method for his students, Johann Gerhard was 400 years ahead of the best-available modern neuroscientific findings about the plasticity of the brain and the formation of neural pathways. The old Socratic method generated learning by forcing elaboration, clarification, connection, and counter-argumentation. I used to feel bad asking catechumens questions to which I knew they did not (yet) have the answers. As it turns out, that is one of the most effective things a teacher can do: “If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son?” (Matt. 22:45).

“The best-researched and most successful learning method is elaboration” (Ahrens-2017, 89).

For these reasons, I do not use a pure digital system. Fleeting notes (see Dr. Mayes’s post) should be made with pencil and paper. But once I am ready to make a permanent note, I go digital. For me the reasons are simple:

  1. I will actually do it. I am not nearly committed enough to indexing and handwriting to maintain a proper analog system.
  2. When I write, I write on the computer. So my permanent notes are in the same place as my writing.
  3. If I want analog notes (e.g., during Bible class), I simply query the notes I want and hit “print.”

II. A Digital Method

When I read, I keep a folded half sheet of paper in the book and make notes with a pencil. A key is not to just mark things but to write down why you are marking them and what thoughts you have at the time.

The worthier of these notes then go into plain text computer files. One file per note. Use plain text because it is simple to search and will never be deprecated. Do not use proprietary formats or software. If you need formatting use something simple like Markdown (https://www.markdownguide.org/cheat-sheet/).

Again, do not use special programs. Not even MS Word. You can search an entire plain text directory without hassle if you use a specific file-naming scheme. I use DATE--TITLE_KEYWORDS.EXTENSION (borrowed from here). Using the date and time means that each note will have a unique ID, even if the notes were created in the same morning.

Example: 20220719T072731–weak-faith-is-true-faith__faith_gerhard_justification.md

A sample note (click for larger size):



This scheme enables several features without becoming dependent on any software. I know it exists, but I avoid special software because it is highly unlikely that I will still be using it in 20 years. The metadata at the top of the file is optional. Feel free to ignore or adapt. A useful addition might be to add an author: field.

With this method, you can tag your notes and link them to each other by the unique filename. Anything that is a note on a Bible passage I tag with book and chapter (e.g., rom8). Need notes on Romans 8? Just search for “_rom8.” Simple. Therefore you can search them a number of ways: by content, date, name, keywords. And that’s mostly all just using the filename.

I don’t use an index or sort notes into folders. The computer makes them unnecessary, and I hate “deciding” where things go. There is also such thing as a “metanote” (tagged as such) which is like a mini index for a specific topic or research line, but I don’t use those much.

Why do I not worry about folders? If you think about it, whether you put notes in a book/file and index them or put them on notecards/textfiles and tag them, it amounts to the same thing. A folder on a computer is just a “tag.” With a digital system the “index” is auto-generated every time I search and I don’t have to maintain it.

To summarize:

  • Always read with paper and a pencil
  • Plain text only on the computer
  • No special software dependencies besides a good plain text editor
  • One “thought” = one file
  • Notes need to be able to reference one another by a unique filename
  • No indexing or sorting things into different folders

Final Thoughts

My sermons are stored in regular folders (one for each Sunday, but if I were starting from scratch, I wouldn’t bother with the folders). So if I have an idea, e.g., for Pentecost, I will open that file and save the note there. When I go to write that sermon I may or may not use that note. And if the note is worthy of being permanent, I will put it in my permanent notes and then put a reference to it in that sermon’s file.

I try to read some of my notes every day (synced to my phone), usually after my Bible reading. Sometimes this leads to writing new notes. By linking notes together, you can write entire papers or sermons “on accident” over time. I don’t do a lot of this as a preacher, though. Instead, when I write sermons I search and reference my notes. Often I make a note and then also link it in a file for an upcoming sermon to remind myself. I rarely write from a blank page anymore. Being on the One-year lectionary, I basically know for what Sunday any given note or thought I have throughout the year might be useful.

Sunday, May 14, 2023

How to Organize Analog Commonplace Books for Theology or Anything Else

Spanish translation of this article is found HERE.

Why Commonplace Books?

Knowledge workers have always needed ways to organize their knowledge for future retrieval, memory, and thought support. The classic commonplace book method is simple enough to be used by high school students, and robust enough to be used by professors and advanced scholars. We have to take notes in such a way that, as we go, we do our future writing and put it all in one place (Ahrens 2017, 140). “Read with a pen in your hand, take smart notes and make connections between them. Ideas will come by themselves and your writing will develop from there” (Ahrens 2017, 151).

Kinds of Commonplace Books

For an all-analog system for a Lutheran theologian, there will be four kinds of notebooks: (1) Biblical Commonplaces. (2) Systematic Commonplaces. (3) Bibliography. (4) Index.

Organization of the Commonplace Books

The parts of the Commonplace Book include the following.

Title: The kind of Commonplace Book it is: biblical, systematic, index, or bibliography.

Volume letter: Biblical and systematic volumes are in separate sequences. The first systematic volume is A, the second is B, and so on. The first biblical volume is βΑ, the second is βΒ, the third is βC, and so on. (The Greek letter β stands for βιβλικός, “biblical.”)

Volume index (1–2 pages): It indexes the content of this particular notebook.

Content pages: I recommend filling up notebooks from start to finish, and thus using every page. If you try to allocate a set amount of pages to certain topics, inevitably many if not most of the pages will remain blank forever. Also, at the beginning of your career you do not know where your future interests will lead. Therefore a simple, haphazard way of assigning page topics is needed. When indexed, these randomly arranged pages are easy to find. Only one Bible chapter is assigned per page (in biblical notebooks), and only one headword letter combination (in systematic notebooks) is assigned per page. Instructions on headword letter combinations will be given below in the section on Systematic Commonplace Books.

Title of page: This is a chapter of the Bible (in biblical), or a headword letter combination (in systematic notebooks).

Page number: After the index, content pages are numbered sequentially: 1, 2, 3, ...

Left margin: The area left of the red line is used for headwords (in systematic) or verse numbers (in biblical notebooks).

Header and footer: The top of the header is used for the page title. Content notes begin above the first line. Reserve a footer of 3–4 lines for overflow text or future short notes. Extra space in the header can serve this purpose, too, if the footer is filled.

Notetaking

Fleeting notes: Read with a scratch piece of paper and pen or pencil. As you read, write down the ideas of the book very briefly with their page numbers. This is like your personal index for this book or article. These are called “fleeting notes” or in Latin, conjectanea. Some of these fleeting notes can be rough drafts (half-baked ideas) of what you will put into your commonplaces. These notes are soon discarded, after they have been pondered and turned into permanent notes, or else rejected. Be sure also to add to your bibliography and index before discarding your fleeting notes.

Permanent notes: Go through your fleeting notes and think about what might be relevant for the notes that are already in your commonplaces. If need be, write a draft of what you will put into the commonplaces. After waiting a few days, if the draft still seems worthy to put into your commonplaces, add it to the proper place and add cross-references. Further instructions will be given below in the section on Systematic Commonplace Books.

Project notes: These are notes that have been written for a particular writing project. They are drawn either from the permanent notes or from other reading (fleeting notes). After a writing project is finished, these notes are either discarded or archived (Ahrens 2017, 41–42).

Biblical Commonplace Books

Record exegetical notes on the Bible in these. They are organized by chapter of the Bible. One may choose to keep separate notebooks for the OT and NT. Organization of the notebook: The volume title will be “Biblical Commonplaces,” and the volume number will be a letter. Perhaps you can add a β on the title page in front of the volume letter, to make clear that this is a biblical commonplace volume. For the volume index, put the abbreviation for each book of the Bible (perhaps just OT or NT) to the left of the red line, one book per line. A page can be assigned to only one Bible chapter, but the pages are not assigned in advance. Whenever you need a page for a particular Bible chapter, title the page appropriately and put the page number in the volume index. In the index, put the chapter number on the line for the book, draw a box around it, and put the first page number beside it. For example:

2 Tim. |  [2] 45

There is no need to index additional pages that are set aside for the same chapter, since they will be cross-referenced from the first page of that chapter. Keep a footer of four rows for overflow. (See illustration “Biblical Index”.)


Each content page handles just one chapter of the Bible. At the top of the page, write the book name and chapter number. The rest of the header space is for the outline of the chapter. If possible, fill this out right away, all on one or two lines. (Other lines of the header could be used for different ways of outlining the chapter.) Also include in the header the verses of the chapter that appear in your church’s lectionary. The left margin of the page is reserved for verse numbers. These do not have to be in numerical order. Since the numbers are clearly indicated in the margin, it is easy to find material on any given verse.

First compare the most important versions (translations), such as ESV, NKJV, KJV, Weber Vulgate Latin, Nova Vulgata Latin, Elberfelder 1985 German, Luther 1545 German, and Reina Valera 1960 Spanish, plus the Septuagint Greek for the Old Testament. If you do not yet read Latin, consult the Douay-Rheims instead of the Vulgate. If the versions agree, just move on. There is little need to do lexical work for those words, since the meaning is universally acknowledged. But where the versions vary significantly, parse and look up the Greek or Hebrew words in respected dictionaries and grammars. Notes on all of the former should be done on scratch paper. (See illustration “Biblical fleeting note”.) 


Now decide what you want to remember for posterity and write a brief, well-arranged note in your notebook. Here is an example of a final linguistic note:

22   שׁוֹבֵב "traditionally: backsliding, faithless” (HALOT, though they propose an unconvinving emendation); “backsliding” (KJV, NKJV); “faithless” (ESV); “rebellis” (NVul, Elb, Luth, RVR); “vaga” (Vul); ἠτιμωμένη [disgraced (BDAG ἀτιμόω)] (LXX); ᾑταμίας [unashamed, precocious] (LXX at 49:4, same Hbr word).

Next, use your Biblical Commonplaces to record other information, such as apparent contradictions and their solutions; significant doctrines that arise from the text; beautiful, memorable statements of the fathers, including the Book of Concord and Luther; useful applications; and illustrations. These do not have to be in any particular order, but the verse number always needs to be in the left margin so that all the material on any given verse can be found quickly.

If there are significant cross-references to other Bible passages, write these in the left margin in parentheses. Then put these into the volume index with the page number in parentheses. This way it is clear from the index that these are just cross-references and not entire pages devoted to the chapter. For example:

2 Tim.  |  [2] (1)

You can also cross-reference to your biblical commonplaces from any other commonplace volume, or from your master index, by referring to volume, page, and Bible reference. For example: VIRGIN BIRTH  |  βA6 on Jer 31:22.

If you fill up a page, find the next blank page and write the book and chapter there. At the bottom of the full page, draw a right arrow and write the page number of the new page, and on the new page at the top inside margin, draw a left arrow and the page number of the old, full page. If pages of the same chapter stand beside each other, simple arrows without page numbers suffice. (See illustration “Biblical content”.)


If you desire to study other large, classic texts in a way that is organized by the contents of the document (such as the Book of Concord), then separate notebooks could be kept, with indices and pages organized by document and article.

Systematic Commonplaces

The most basic way to use a commonplace book is as storage for things you want to find later on. In this case, you put quotations and thoughts into spaces that are assigned to a particular topic, index your notes, and then find your notes easily at any time in the future. The more advanced way is as an external brain, a way to build up deep thinking over time. This requires more significant cross-referencing and constant reflection on how new notes support or challenge old notes.

In systematic commonplace books, again, the volume number is a letter. Arrangement is by topic, not by Bible chapter. Pages are assigned not to specific topics, but to initial letter-initial vowel combinations. For example, on the page assigned to “Co” one would put notes concerning “CONFESSION” “COMMUNION” and “COMMONPLACES.” The first two pages are devoted to a volume index. This index includes each letter of the alphabet, with all six vowels for each letter of the alphabet: a, e, i, o, u, y. For example, the first twelve lines of the index would be: Aa, e, i, o, u, y; Ba, e, i, o, u, y. K and Q are not subdivided by their vowels; all the K words are on the same page, and all the Q words are on the same page. Thus, K and Q each need only one line in the index. All words starting with X, Y, or Z are placed on the same page, so these three letters together are given just one line in the index. (See illustration “Systematic or Bibliography index”.)


On the content pages, the headword is written in the margin, so that one can easily find the notes that are sought. Leave a line between notes. Each note should be lettered with a lowercase letter, each page starting with “a.” E.g.:

a. BAPTISM OF INFANTS] “Infants are to be baptized because . . .” (Balduin 1618, 48).

This manner of enumeration allows you to refer to specific notes from anywhere. If “Ba” was page 82 of volume C, the note above would be “C82a.” This unambiguous, simple reference system is what enables cross-referencing among all notes in the system.

To add a note to the commonplaces, pick a main topic (a headword or “commonplace”). Put the main noun first. Be rigorous about this. Otherwise you will not know where to find things. For example: “Catholicism, Roman” (on the Ca page); “Orthodoxy, Eastern” (on the Oo page); “Federation, Lutheran World” (on the Fe page); “Synod, Lutheran Church Missouri” (on the Sy page); “Councils, Ecumenical” (on the Co page). Then you will add cross references back (A2b <--) and forward (--> B3c) to other related notes, and to miscellaneous references (cf. C4d).

In theology, there are well-defined categories that have been used for centuries and millenia. These are useful for structuring theological thought. This is why I recommend that you select a headword (commonplace) for each entry, even if other headwords might be just as apt. Begin by picking headwords that correspond to classic theological categories. Then, in the future you can invent new headwords and cross-reference to them. For now, simply put notes where they seem to fit. Ask: “What is this about? How will I want to find this later?” Pick the headword that seems to fit best and put the note in the page for that letter-vowel combination. Do not pick keywords that are overly specific. For example “Prayer, Intercessory” is a good topic. “Prayer, Intercessory, is Limited Sometimes” is too specific. Then, think through whether the note connects with other notes that you have entered into the commonplace books, and add cross-references, possibly with new notes that explain the connection. Finally, if the new note does not cross-reference to any previous content, add references to this note in your master index, wherever you think it fits. For example, a note on parenting is on the “Pa” page. There are no other commonplace notes on parenting. Enter the reference in the master index not just under “parenting” but also under “chastisement” and “discipline.”

What to put in the commonplace book? Excerpts, cross-references, and notes. Excerpts: For books that are rare or that you do not own, you may want to write out quotations in your commonplace books, because in the future you will not have the original books to refer to. But do not just write excerpts. Also summarize the content in your own words and make connections with other content in your commonplaces.

Cross-references: There is no need to write out whole Bible verses or Book of Concord passages. Just give a reference with a brief indication of its content in your own words. But if you love the passage and want to memorize it, go ahead and write it down in full. Books that you own do not need to be quoted verbatim unless the quote is beautiful, memorable, or contentious. Instead, give a literature reference with a brief sentence of what the passage is about. E.g.:

LAW'S THIRD USE]  Luther affirms the third use of the Law, but it is contested whether he used this expression (LW 72:123).

CAESAROPAPISM]  Gerhard claims that the civil magistrate has a unique role in the call process (Gerhard 2017, 123).

For literature references, I suggest using Turabian’s author-date style, since it does not require footnotes, which are difficult in an analog system. But since there would be ambiguity if an author has more than one title per year, it is sometimes necessary to add a word from the title, e.g. Gerhard 2017 Interp., 104; Ahrens 2017 Smart, 100.

Notes: In your daily Bible reading, always be looking for something to index. But even more importantly, if something seems worth remembering, write down why it seems significant, and write down all the possible headwords that pertain. This can become a short entry in your commonplaces. You would explain what the Bible passage says and why it is applicable to this headword.

At the beginning of making your commonplace system, you might not have anything to cross-reference with your new notes. But soon you will be able to cross-refernece to notes that are potentially related. For example, I can put a new note on Jer. 23:16–17, 21–22, 36 in the commonplaces with the headword CHARISMATICS, but then must cross-reference it to REVELATION and PROPHECY, and maybe even BIBLIOMANCY (since my note says that this passage stands against charismatics, who claim immediate revelation). If I do not feel like writing new notes for all of those headwords, I will just add entries in my master index pointing to this note in the commonplaces. (See illustration “Systematic content”.)


Bibliography

Every book or article you read should be entered into your bibliography. While software is a good way to handle bibliography for many people, here I will discuss analog bibliography notebooks. Bibliography notebooks are numbered by letter, preceded by the Greek letter δ (an arbitrary symbol, to enable succinct cross-referencing). At the start of the bibliography notebook, make a letter-vowel index in the same way as was done for the systematic commonplace books. (See illustration “Systematic or Bibliography index,” above.) Entries are organized by the author’s last name. So both “Smith, John” and “Schmidt, Johann” will be placed on a page labelled “Si”. Whenever a new page is labelled, add it to the volume index. Pages are assigned to letter-vowel combinations as needed, from the beginning to the end of the notebook.

Use a standard format, such as Turabian. Turabian author-date style is well-suited to analog notebooks, since there is no need to use footnotes.

Immediately after reading a book or article, write a few sentences (on scratch paper) summarizing the work. Then add the bibliography to the notebook, followed by your summary, and perhaps a few page numbers to the book or article with the topics or arguments handled there. Then add key words in ALL CAPS. It is important to cross-reference to all the topics by which you might want to find this book or article again. (See illustration “Bibliography content”.)


After adding the book or article to the bibliography, make permanent notes to add to the commonplaces for whatever you deem worthy to keep, cross-referencing the new notes to everything else in the system that is relevant. This way the article or book will be found again in various contexts.

Master Index

A master index becomes necessary as soon as one has filled up a few notebooks. It is easy to use a plain text computer file as a master index, but here I will discuss analog master indices, which can be made gradually and do not require retyping or rewriting. In a blank notebook, number the pages, and give one page to each letter-vowel combination, such as Aa, Ae, Ai, Ao, Au, Ay, and so on. (Give only one page each to K, Q, and XYZ.) This requires 131 pages. In an 80 or 100 sheet notebook, there are then plenty of blank pages, which can be used as overflow, if one of the original 131 pages is filled. Then, write the indexed word in the left margin. There is no need to leave a footer on these pages. If you fill up the last line, indicate on what page this letter-vowel combination is continued. Use very brief abbreviations for the Bible and Book of Concord. The only other references needed should be to the biblical or systematic commonplaces, or the bibliography notebooks (e.g., B89d, or βA105 on Ps2:9, or δΑ104). Try to keep the index topics general, and develop specificity within the systematic commonplaces. For example, “Prayer, Intercessory” is a good index entry. “Prayer, Intercessory, is Limited Sometimes” is too specific. These volumes do not need a volume index, since the whole volume is an index. (See illustration “Index volume content”.)

Now for more explanation, see my lecture from May 15, 2023, over at YouTube

Works Cited

Ahrens, Sönke. 2017. How to Take Smart Notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking—For Students, Academics and Nonfiction Book Writers. North Charleston, SC: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

See Also

Locke, John. 1706. “A New Method of a Common-Place-Book.” In Posthumous Works of Mr. John Locke, 311–36. London: W.B. https://books.google.com/books?id=ShYPAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA311#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Mayes, Benjamin T. G. 2004. “Loci Communes: A Theologian’s Best Friend: Or, How to Make the Theological Tool of Your Dreams.” Logia: A Journal of Lutheran Theology 13 (3): 7–10.

The Literary Diary: Or, Improved Common-Place-Book. 1814. London: Taylor and Hessey. https://books.google.com/books?id=Y3NaAAAAcAAJ.

Todd, John. 1835. Index Rerum, or Index of Subjects; Intended as a Manual, to Aid the Student and the Professional Man in Preparing Himself for Usefulness. London: Hamilton, Adams, & Co. https://books.google.com/books?id=srVfAAAAcAAJ.

 

Benjamin T. G. Mayes

Rogate Sunday, May 14, 2023

Wednesday, January 25, 2023

How to Read the Bible for the First Time

 If you've never read the Bible before, I don't recommend simply going from start to finish. Instead, read it this way:

  • Genesis (all)
  • Exodus 1-20
  • Numbers 11-27
  • Psalms: 1, 18, 22, 23, 32, 34, 36, 42-43, 45-46, 51, 69, 70, 72, 87, 93, 95, 98, 100, 110-134
  • Isaiah: 4-9, 14, 25-26, 40, 42, 49-56, 59-66
  • Matthew-Jude (all)
  • The rest of the Old Testament
  • Revelation
  • Apocryphal books (optional)

This helps you to see Jesus as the fulfillment of the Old Testament, and then to go back and fill in the gaps.


Friday, June 18, 2021

Memory Tricks for Learning Greek

At this time of year we at Concordia Theological Seminary Fort Wayne are blessed to have new Greek students. These “Greekies” have a big task in front of them: by the end of the summer, learn all Greek grammar and vocabulary needed for reading the Greek New Testament. It is our “theological boot camp,” and it requires memorizing a huge amount of data.

How to do it? Some students try to memorize by rote repetition: repeating and reviewing over and over until it sinks in (or doesn’t!).

But there is a better way. You need tricks to make this easier. By using memory tricks, you will learn the content faster, which means you can learn more of it in the same amount of time. This will reduce stress and make your skills better, which will lead to you being a better student and theologian.

You have to be able to see each word in your mind visually. My tricks are as follows.

1. Word substitution. Substitute English words you know and can see for Greek words that you don’t know. For example, κεφαλή (he kephale, meaning “the head”) sounds like “coffee latte.” So there you’ve made a word substitution.

2. The Link. To link two concepts together, you have to form a very visual, memorable picture in your mind that includes both of them. For example, picture an enormous glass of coffee latte balancing on your head. Now you have an easy way to remember that κεφαλή means "the head." As for the fact that it’s a feminine noun, try making the coffee cup a bright pink in your picture.

3. A visual Greek alphabet. Sometimes you have to memorize word endings, and the differences come down to single letters. Here you can make a mental picture for each letter of the Greek alphabet. Here’s what I use. Some of them might not work for you; feel free to make your own. (The same thing can be done for the English alphabet, too!)

Greek Alphabet

α - Alpha Romeo (car)

β - Beta carotene (carrot)

γ - Gamma rays (Hulk)

δ - Delta airlines

ε - Pepsi

ζ - Zeta scanner (in the library)

η - Ate

θ - Thesis

ι - Yoda

κ - Cap

λ - Lamb

μ - Moo (cow)

ν - News

ξ - Excite

ο - Oh my crayon

π - Pie

ρ - Row

σ - Sick ma

τ - Taoism (yin-yang symbol)

υ - Up salon

φ - Wi-Fi

χ - Chi (Dr. Strange's mentor, using chi power)

ψ - Sci-fi

ω - Make-up

 

4. Numeral sounds and picture. Finally, there are times when you’ll need to memorize a number. You do this by changing each numeral 0-9 into a specific consonant sound. Then you can make words out of the numbers. This website explains how it works.

God’s blessings as you use these tricks to learn New Testament Greek!

Tuesday, August 6, 2019

Note Card Method of Writing

My main tip for writing is to use a version of the note card method. Here is how I write.

  • Your best thoughts will come to you as you read and interact with texts. So you need to capture those thoughts on paper as you are reading.
  • Write out your thoughts, with one thought or one paragraph per sheet of paper. The benefit of having only one thought or paragraph per sheet of paper is that when it comes time to write, you can easily shuffle your notes into any order you like. If you take all your notes in a word processor document or a notebook, you can't easily shuffle the notes around, and you probably won't remove content that should be removed.
  • I prefer to use half-sheets of paper, three-hole punched, and put into a statement-size binder. Others prefer to use note cards. 
  • At the top of the sheet of paper, write the topic. I use all caps.
  • At the bottom of the sheet of paper, write a footnote if one is needed. This might just be a short reference, like: Mayes, How to Write, p. 42.
  • After you take your first note from a text, type up the bibliography for that text in your computer. This could be done using bibliography software (I use Zotero), or it could just be in a word processor document. Format it for footnotes.
  • In your notes, distinguish somehow between your summary of what the text said, and your own thoughts and reflections. I distinguish between them by writing a footnote with a reference if I am summarizing someone else, and putting curly brackets around, or an eighth-note (musical note) beside, my own thoughts.
  • Early on, think about what the outline for your paper might be. But you don't have to decide this at the beginning. It will become obvious to you as you take notes.
  • Eventually, you will have your notes, and you will have an outline. Now put your notes into order, according to your outline. You will find that you can't use some of your notes because they don't contribute anything to the purpose of the paper. That's to be expected.
  • Type up the notes. You'll have to add some transition sentences. Some of your reflections will serve as the "conclusion" section. 
  • Done! That's your paper.

The method makes writing so much easier, once you implement it. The beauty of it is that you do 90% of the writing while you are engaged with the text, which is when your best thoughts will occur.

Lutheran Theology Reading List

==FIRST==

Read through the entire Bible. I prefer NKJV.
Read the entire Book of Concord. I prefer the classic 1921 translation of Dau and Bente (Concordia Triglotta).
Leonard Hutter, Compend of Lutheran Theology. This will put the right theological categories into your mind and help you to make sense of all future theological readings.
Johann Gerhard, Sacred Meditations. Free old translation, free audiobook, or new translation.
August Friedrich Christian Vilmar, The Theology of Facts versus the Theology of Rhetoric: Confession and Defense. Translated by Roy A. Harrisville. Fort Wayne: Lutheran Legacy, 2008.

==NON-THEOLOGICAL, BUT VERY IMPORTANT==

Cal Newport, Deep Work.
David Allen, Getting Things Done.

==NEXT BOOKS==

Benjamin T. G. Mayes, ed., Martin Luther on Holy Baptism: Sermons to the People (1523-39).
Johann Gerhard, On Interpreting Sacred Scripture and Method of Theological Study, Theological Commonplaces I-II.
The Brotherhood Prayer Book.
Concordia Commentary Series. Galatians recommended as the first purchase.
Bengt Hägglund, History of Theology.
Augustine, On Christian Teaching. (Excellent handbook on biblical interpretation and preaching.)
Michael W. Holmes, trans., The Apostolic Fathers
Timothy Schmeling, ed., Lives & Writings of the Great Fathers of the Lutheran Church.
Johann Gerhard, Commentary on 1 and 2 Timothy.
Valerius Herberger, The Great Works of God: Genesis
Valerius Herberger, The Great Works of God: Exodus.
Luther’s Works (series). Especially suggested are the volumes on Church Postil (LW 75-79).
Theodore G. Tappert, ed., Luther: Letters of Spiritual Counsel.
Paul Althaus, The Ethics of Martin Luther.
Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin Luther.
Johann Gerhard, Schola Pietatis (Series). This is Gerhard's moral theology.
Werner Elert, Eucharist and Church Fellowship in the First Four Centuries.
Hermann Sasse, Letters to Lutheran Pastors (Series).
Gerhard, On Christ, Theological Commonplaces Exegesis IV.
Gerhard, On the Church, Theological Commonplace XXV.
CFW Walther, Pastoral Theology.
Peter C. Bender, Lutheran Catechesis: A comprehensive guide to Catechesis for a Lutheran Congregation.
Paul H. D. Lang, Ceremony and Celebration.
Pastoral Care Companion (CPH).
Tom G. A. Hardt, On the Sacrament of the Altar: A Book of the Lutheran Doctrine of the Lord’s Supper (Concordia Theological Seminary Press).

Bible Treasury Table of Contents


You can make your own collection of treasures from Sacred Scripture!  Simply: 1) get a blank book, 2) as you read the Scriptures or hear sermons and notice things you want to remember, figure out what topic your discovery belongs to, 3) write the verse reference, the verse, and/or your notes on the page of your book dedicated to that topic.  Limit one topic per page.  If you fill up a page, note at the bottom right-hand corner of the page where you are continuing this topic.  4) Use this index to note the pages where your topics can be found, so that you can come back to your notes later.  This index is organized according to the Ten Commandments (for the Christian life, love, and morality), and the Apostles’ Creed (for the Christian faith and doctrine).  Feel free to add to or subtract from this list, according to your own needs. 

1st Chief Part (10 Commandments)
The Law
              Moral Law
              Ceremonial Law
              Civil Law
Love

1st Commandment
Promises of the 1st Commandment
Threats of the 1st Commandment

Virtues and Vices:
Knowledge of God from His Word
Ignorance or false views of God
Atheism
Polytheism
Judaism
Islam
Anti-Trinitarians
Pagan Philosophy
             
Fear of God
Love toward God
Trust in God
Humility
Patience
Hope
False Worship of the True God
Superstition
Idolatry (worshipping other gods, especially images)
Trust in Created Things
Fleshly Security toward God
Hate of God
Hypocritical Love of God
Loving Self or Created Things above God
Doubting God
Pride and Presumption (sense of entitlement)
Impatience and Grumbling Toward God

2nd Commandment
Promises of the 2nd Commandment
Threats of the 2nd Commandment

Virtues and Vices:
Reverence
Irreverence

Worship and Invocation of God’s Name
Neglecting to Use God’s Name
Neglecting to Invoke God’s Name and Worship Him
Blasphemy (speech against God and His Word)
Magic/Witchcraft
Fortune-telling
Spiritism

Prayer
Invocation of the Saints

Praise
Thanksgiving
Sacrifice
Neglecting to Thank God

Confession of the Faith and Witnessing to Others
Neglecting to Confess the Faith

God-Pleasing Oaths/Vows
God-Displeasing Oaths/Vows
Breaking Oaths/Vows
Lying by God’s Name

Blessing
Cursing (when permitted/commanded)
Cursing (when forbidden)
Wishing Others Evil

3rd Commandment
Promises of the 3rd Commandment
Threats of the 3rd Commandment
Sabbath
Holiness
Church Year

Virtues:
Gathering for Divine Service
Church Duties: Preachers
              Preaching and Teaching
              Impart Sacraments
              Shepherding / Guidance
Church Duties: Hearers
Hearing Preaching
Use of the Holy Sacraments
Monetary Contributions to Preserve the Preaching Office and Congregation

Vices:
Neglecting/despising the Visible Church
Neglecting/despising the Ministry
Neglecting/despising the Word
Neglecting/despising the Sacraments
False Preaching or Imparting of Sacraments

4th Commandment
Promises of the 4th Commandment
Threats of the 4th Commandment

Family Duties: Parents
              Christian Instruction in the Home
Family Duties: Children
Civil Government
Civic Duties: Rulers
Civic Duties: Subjects
Justice
Courts

5th Commandment
Promises of the 5th Commandment
Threats of the 5th Commandment
Murder
Suicide
Killing Animals Permitted
The Sword
War
              Capital Punishment
Anger
Hate
Revenge
Patience Toward Enemies
Peace-Making
Preserving the Lives of Others

6th Commandment
Promises of the 6th Commandment
Threats of the 6th Commandment
Holy Marriage
              Definition of marriage
              Persons qualified for marriage
              How to enter marriage
              Purpose of marriage
Family Duties: Men
Family Duties: Women
Sex
Procreation
Chastity
Unchaste Touching
Unchaste Speech
Unchaste Clothing
Celibacy
Nudity
Adultery
Fornication
Masturbation
Homosexuality
Seduction
Sins of the Eyes
Prostitution
Incest
Polygamy (Plural Marriage)

Moderation
Asceticism
Drugs and Alcohol
Drunkenness
Sloth (Over-eating)
Fasting

7th Commandment
Promises of the 7th Commandment
Threats of the 7th Commandment
Stealing/Theft
Robbery
Cheating in Business
Unfair Pricing
Usury
Lawsuits
Show of Right
Love of Money
Possessions
Poverty
Work
Laziness
Gambling

8th Commandment
Promises of the 8th Commandment
Threats of the 8th Commandment
Lying
Truth
Secrecy
Betrayal
Mockery
Slander
Protecting Reputation
Contracts
Deception
Gossip

9th and 10th Commandments
Promises of the 9th and 10th Commandments
Threats of the 9th and 10th Commandments
Coveting / Lust / Concupiscence
Temptation

What Does God Say About All These Commandments?
Fulfillment of the Law
Use of the Law: Curb, Rule, and Mirror
Sin
Evil
Original Sin
Actual Sin (Sins of Action: Commission or Omission)
Mortal and Venial Sins (Ruling and Non-Ruling Sins)
“Sin against the Holy Spirit”
Sins that cry out
Approving of the Sins of Others
Scandal
Repentance & Confessing our Sins
Good Works

2nd Chief Part (Creed)
Gospel

1) I believe
Faith
In God the Father
God
Plurality of Persons
Unity of Substance
Almighty
Attributes of God
Maker of heaven and earth
Creation
Angels
Humanity is Male or Female
Body
Soul
Image of God in Man
Providence and Preservation of Creatures
2) And in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord
              Divinity of Christ
3) Who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary
Humanity of Christ
Unity of Christ
Communication of Attributes
Virgin Mary
4) Suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried,
Offices of Christ: Prophet
Offices of Christ: Priest
              Obedience
              Atonement/Reconciliation
              Intercession
State of Humiliation
5) He descended into hell;  The third day He rose again from the dead;
State of Exaltation
6) He ascended into heaven and sits at the right hand of God, the Father Almighty.
Offices of Christ: King
7) From thence He will come to judge the living and the dead.
Last Judgment
8) I believe in the Holy Spirit,
Holy Spirit’s Divinity
Holy Spirit a person
Holy Scripture
              Rules of Interpreting Scripture
9) The holy Christian Church, the communion of Saints,
Church
Church Councils
Call Process for Preachers
Church Government
Holy Sacrament of the Altar
10) The forgiveness of sins,
Holy Baptism
Holy Absolution
Free Will
Justification by Faith
Adoption
11) The resurrection of the body
              Regeneration
              Mystical Union with God
              Resurrection
12) And the life everlasting.  Amen.
Eternal Life
Predestination (Election) unto Eternal Life
Hell
Purgatory

3rd Chief Part (Prayer) See 2nd Commandment.
4th, 5th, and 6th Chief Parts (Baptism, Absolution, and Sacrament of the Altar): See Creed

How to Write a Research Paper in Historical Theology


The Parts of a Research Paper

A research paper in historical theology has three parts: 
  1. The thesis and state of the question, which summarizes and categorizes the secondary sources. 
  2. Body, which includes your arguments based on the primary sources. 
  3. The conclusion, which situates your findings in the state of the question.

Thesis and State of the Question

Forget a cute literary hook to grab the reader. This is OK for a speech, though. You should catch your reader by showing that you have something to say.

Thesis. The paper should not be “exploring” or “examining” a topic, but rather “demonstrating” or “proving” a thesis. You may not know exactly what the thesis is until you are half-way through taking notes.

State of the Question. Give the state of the question. This is a paradigmatic analysis of what has been done, with notation of the materials which are to be used.
  1. Ask, “What are the secondary writers saying about the primary sources?”
  2. Discuss the status controversiae. Which of the secondary sources are correct?
  3. Say, “I have something to say that others haven’t done.”

Do this in about two or three paragraphs. This gives a “warrant for starting” your essay. It shows that you have something to say, and that you know what has been said. You have to cover the secondary sources, but it can’t overwhelm your essay. It should be about 10% of the essay.

Body

The body of the research paper focuses predominantly on analysis of primary texts. Nevertheless, it can have dialogue with secondary sources. Names of other scholars can be included there in the body text. Sometimes this is helpful to make points over against someone else.

Conclusion

A conclusion must conclude. It should not introduce new evidence. It cannot state more than what you set out at the beginning to prove. It must stay within the boundaries established by the materials you have examined. The conclusion should show that you have advanced the state of the question to a new position.

Conclusions of historical papers are usually generalizations. We then question these generalizations. No generalization ever quite fits, but you need to do it. For example, I wrote on Luther on marriage and sexuality. At the end I generalized to depict Luther (on the basis of my analysis of his writings) as a champion of chastity rather than a liberator in sexual matters.

The conclusion should be short.

The conclusion must not go beyond your primary sources! For example, if you have analyzed five books by Luther, you cannot say that Luther never says X. You can say that Luther does not say X in these five books!

The conclusion must take what you have proved in the body and situate it with reference to the previous state of the question. This could be: (1) Confirming the position of some previous researchers by finding the same thing in hitherto unresearched primary sources. (2) Challenging the position of other previous researchers by a new examination of previously researched primary sources. (3) Challenging the position of other previous researchers by an examination of previously unresearched primary sources.
It should not: (4) Simply confirm the position of some previous researchers on the basis of previously researched primary sources. (5) It should not ever make conclusions on the basis of secondary sources.

Footnotes

Footnotes will be longest and most plentiful in the beginning state-of-the-question section, perhaps up to 2/3 of the page. The body will have consistent footnotes, but usually taking up less than 1/4 of the page, since your analysis will be focused on one document at a time. The conclusion is where you can say what you think. You don’t need any footnotes here.

Do not put excursûs in footnotes.

A research paper that uses the notes-bibliography style actually does not need a bibliography. A thesis with several chapters does.

How to Do the Research

In any given field there are tools. Never assume that you’re the first one to ask a question. Most tools have a text history.
  1. Get a quick overview of the topic by using a theological encyclopedia.
  2. Read both primary and secondary sources, going back and forth from one to the other.
  3. Ask, “What are the secondary sources saying about the primary sources?”
  4. Figure out the state of the question. Which of the secondary sources are correct?
  5. Figure out what you have to say that that others haven’t said.
  6. Start framing the introductory paragraph at the beginning of your research. Ask, “Where am I going with this essay? What is my topic? How does my topic construe? How will I go about it?”

Secondary sources are what scholars are saying about your topic. Primary sources are historical documents closest to what you’re researching. For example, if you are writing an article about Luther, an article in the Oxford Encyclopedia of the Reformation is a secondary source; a sermon by Luther is a primary source.

Primary sources have the most proximate relationship to the topic you are studying. These are in three forms:
  1. From the era itself, either published or in manuscript. (Example: a 1529 printing of the Small Catechism.)
  2. Critical editions. These add biblical allusions and sources. (Example: the Small Catechism in the Weimar edition of Luther's works.)
  3. Translations. Be sure to check the reliability of these. Be careful, sometimes they add Scripture references that the original author did not include, and sometimes the editors are not careful to note their additions (e.g., by using square brackets). Also, the footnotes referring to scholastics may not have been read by the original author (Luther). The editorial references may not be helpful. So try also to use the original.

Secondary sources are more distant, and base themselves on an analysis of the primary sources. Secondary sources may never be used to fill up gaps in your knowledge.

Do not cite tertiary sources (i.e., sources that base themselves or summarize secondary sources, like Luther Digest, Lutheran Cyclopedia, or Wikipedia). But you can use the tertiary sources to find the secondary and primary sources. Then disregard whatever you read in the tertiary source.

What is the requisite level of detail for this paper? It depends on the level of detail in the primary and secondary sources. Never thin it out. Either take a bigger or smaller topic. Either pare it down or bulk it up with real material.

How to approach documents from the past? It should usually bother you intellectually. Don’t write about that, but use it. Notice the differences between then and now. What does this tell me about his context? Hold the dissonance in methodological abeyance. How do you use your subjectivity? Let the difference between you and the text drive you to understand why, what is it out there that’s generating this? Don’t get into correctness.

Once you have the topic, you still have to be tentative about its shape. Don’t prejudge the boundaries, shape, and conclusion.

Also, you cannot ignore secondary literature. Questions to ask of the documents: Is it a topic at all? Is it new, or just new to me? You need to know the state of the question, which is the history of scholarship. This shows you what has been said before.

Steal bibliographies from others. They cannot be copyrighted. Ask, “Is there something they have found that I have missed?” But you can’t steal footnotes. You can, however, use their footnotes to find spots in the primary sources and add “cf. Somebody” or “contra Somebody.” The most recent resources should have the best bibliography. Make a hierarchy of sources and ask, “What’s more important?” “By their footnotes ye shall know them.” Look at a good article’s footnotes to see how to do your own.

Keep a good balance between primary and secondary sources. You have to say something new and different based on the old texts. Is there something missing in the secondary sources?

Sometimes you have to write with the risk of ignorance. As your bibliography gets better you know your weaknesses better. To handle ignorance, you should use the standard references (e.g., Quasten for patristics; Althaus and OER for Luther).

Bibliography Software

Software like Zotero (www.zotero.org, free) will save you a lot of time. They do several things to help you:
  1. Store the bibliographical data.
  2. Format it automatically, for either footnotes or a bibliography.
  3. Insert footnotes with a few clicks.
  4. Import bibliographical data straight from the internet. For example, you can add books straight from the CTS library website, or from ATLA Religion Index. Why type it out when you don’t have to?

The other way is to have a master bibliography file for each project. Enter the full bibliographical data right after you take your first note.

Computerized Searches

Start with the big databases. There has been a proliferation of digital resources since 2000. Nowadays 16th-century and 17th-century texts from Germany have been scanned and are available for reading, free online, and often for download as PDF. One of the best gateways to this material is http://kvk.bibliothek.kit.edu.
Through http://www.ctsfw.edu/resources/more-library-resources/ CTS students have access to:
  • ATLA Religion Database, which indexes journal articles and chapters of multi-author books. (But limited scope. For example, it handles religion, but not historiography.)
  • The Chicago Manual of Style (the same as Turabian, but more detailed).
  • Oxford Reference. (A source for short articles on many topics, with recent research and bibliographies.)
  • Theological Research Exchange Network. (An index of dissertations and theses. Be sure to check the option “exact phrase.”)

“Index Theologicus” from the University of Tübingen is a valuable search engine for historical theology and church history: http://www.ixtheo.de/.

Google Book Search can be a great way to search for discussions on an obscure phrase. Simply place the phrase in quote marks. Another option is to limit the search to a specific time period. https://books.google.com/.

When using search engines, be sure to use “and” and “not,” and, if necessary, the option for an “exact phrase.”

Know the limitations of each database. (1) Scope. (2) Search oddities and user-friendliness. (3) Realize that you have to search on all synonyms.

Encyclopedias

Stay away from general encyclopedias. Specialist ones are OK, if articles are signed and written by a specialist. Never cite a one-volume encyclopedia (like Lutheran Cyclopedia). Yet you may use these to get a quick overview of a topic.

Taking Notes

Leave yourself a paper trail. My main tip is to use a version of the note card method of writing. Here is how I write.
  • Your best thoughts will come to you as you read and interact with texts. So you need to capture those thoughts on paper as you are reading.
  • For secondary sources, I take quick notes on separate pieces of paper for each book or article that you read. What I do is this: I use half-sheets of paper, 3-hole punched and put into a binder. I write the name of the book or article at the top of the sheet. Then I take notes on the book by basically making an index with page numbers, so that I can easily find a place in the book or article later on. Finally, after reading the book or article, I write a short summary of it in only one or two sentences.
  • For primary sources, write out your thoughts, with one thought or one paragraph per sheet of paper. The benefit of having only one thought or paragraph per sheet of paper is that when it comes time to write, you can easily shuffle your notes into any order you like. (If you take all your notes in a word processor document, you can't easily shuffle the notes around.)
  • I prefer to use half-sheets of paper, three-hole punched, and put into a statement-size binder. Others prefer to use note cards.
  • At the top of the sheet of paper, write the topic. I use all caps.
  • At the bottom of the sheet of paper, write a footnote. Don’t do partial footnotes, even if you plan to add it later. You will forget where you got this. Don’t take notes without citing your source. Devise a short title. This might just be a short reference, like: Mayes, How to Write, p. 42. Each paragraph should be footnoted. There should be at least one footnote per paragraph, usually on the last sentence, and after every closed quote. Use a new footnote when the page or paragraph of the source changes.
  • After you take your first note from a text, type up the bibliography for that text in your computer. This could be done using bibliography software, or it could just be in a word processor document. Format it for footnotes.
  • Are you quoting, paraphrasing, or analyzing? If it’s a quote, use quotation marks and a footnote. If it’s a paraphrase, just foonote it. If it’s your own analysis, use some sort of mark to yourself so that you remember that you wrote that. (I use musical eighth-notes.) When taking notes, should you copy or paraphrase? You should usually paraphrase analytically. A short, ten-page essay needs no large quotations. A thirty-page essay can have a few. You may quote phrases, but most of the words should be yours.
  • Early on, think about what the outline for your paper might be. But you don't have to decide this at the beginning. It will become obvious to you as you take notes.
  • Eventually, you will have your notes, and you will have an outline. Now put your notes into order, according to your outline. You will find that you can't use some of your notes because they don't contribute anything to the purpose of the paper. That's to be expected.

How to adapt your method to the computer? Always take notes the same way. You have to be able to put all your notes together and see them. Never take notes in more than two ways, e.g., hardcopy and computer. On computer, keep separate files for each source. When you copy a paragraph of notes for use in your paper, then mark in your notes where you used it. Footnote carefully!

What I sometimes do is to use a computer document to hold the quotations I plan to use, footnoted. In the paper notes, I include the beginning and end of the quote, footnoted, plus whatever analysis I have. This way I can tell where the quote belongs in the essay.

How do I go about arguing the case? Establish a narrative shape. (Tell a story.) Ask, “How does this stuff flow? Chronologically? Topically? Subsets of the controversy? Examining commentaries? Don’t follow the outlines of secondary sources.

Typing it Up

  • Type up the notes.
  • Standardize your formatting. Make a style sheet and use paragraph styles. Always use the same styles.
  • You'll have to add some transition sentences. Don’t write unfootnoted transition paragraphs, though. How to do a major transition? Just throw in a subheading.
  • Some of your reflections will serve as the "conclusion" section.
  • Never use “ibid.” If you move text in a word processor, you’re in trouble.
  • Make sure your work is being backed up after every work session. I use Google Drive, and then my computer does weekly backups, and then from time to time I do yet another backup, to an external drive that I keep somewhere else. (I should really keep this offsite.)
  • No one writes books; you can only write articles. Put enough articles together, and you have a book. Also, no one, in fact, writes whole papers. We can only write sentences and paragraphs, and then ask, “Where does this fit?” “What is the shape of this essay?”

Done! That's your paper. If I didn't use this process, there would be no way I could write the kinds of articles and books that I have written. The method makes it so much easier, once you implement it. The beauty of it is that you do 90% of the writing while you are engaged with the text, which is when your best thoughts will occur.